Jonathan Kraut, whom I assume is a friendly liberal, had a column in this week’s Signal newspaper entitled “Trump Rolls the Dice in Iran Actions.” The piece is well written, as all of Kraut’s are, but of course I disagree with much of it. He wrote: “We have been essentially in a war with Iran since the Iranian revolution in 1979 that ousted the Shah in favor of rule by Islamic law. Until Trump, our handling of this conflict has been somewhat measured and mature.”
Hang on a minute; he calls Obama’s handling of Iran mature? Sure, it was measured all right, but I and many others call that softer than soft and was a detriment to our handling of this terrorist regime. And tell me how mature it was for Obama to not disclose to Congress the existence of secret side deals with inspections on Iran’s nuclear sites when he presented the nuclear deal to Congress. Reportedly they were uncovered by chance when members of Congress found out about them during a meeting with International Atomic Energy Agency.
Later it came to light that the Obama administration had secretly sent a plane to Tehran loaded with $400 million in Swiss francs, Euros and other currencies on the same day Iran released four American hostages, which was followed by two more secret flights carrying another $1.3 billion in cash.
Even after that Obama’s administration secretly tried to help Iran use U.S. banks to convert $5.7 billion in Iranian assets, after promising Congress that Iran would not get access to the U.S. financial system.
I tell ya what, if that is measured and mature, I wonder what treason is, and I wonder how Obama stayed out of the impeachment fire. Besides, now we know why Iran acts like they do, getting way too much for their own good causing them to act like a spoiled child who thinks they can get away with things without consequence. NOT A VERY MATURE WAY to handle things in my book.
Jonathan went on with: “I propose we will experience the wrath of an irate and taunted Iranian regime over the next perhaps year or two and that this conflict will not end well. Despite Trump’s threat of pre-targeting 52 key Iranian installations, so long as Trump is president, nothing on heaven and earth will curb Iran from exacting a thoughtful and comprehensive reign of deadly revenge.”
Hold the phone, Kraut is blaming Trump for Iran’s hate for America? It’s very clear to me that Iran has and will continue their terrorist ways towards us whether it’s out of revenge or pure hate. Continuing to appease them with wimpyness like Obama did will only lead to the exact thing Kraut is afraid will happen. As it was with the likes of Hitler and Saddam Hussein, blunt force is what causes change for good, not measured maturity.
Which Crystal Ball?
Further down the page he wrote: “I predict that Iranian hackers are going to disrupt American banking, air travel and utility networks, plunging our economy and even our personal safety into an unstable climate of chaos. We certainly will experience the deaths of dozens if not hundreds of American service members by Iranian-backed rocket attacks and IEDs globally over the next few years.”
“The price of crude oil will skyrocket if Saudi oil facilities will come under drone attack and oil moving through the Strait of Hormuz will be choked off. And finally, the U.S., already in an undeclared war with Iran, will be forced to overtly declare a state of hostility or humbly back out as a coward.”
Wow, a nice optimistic view of things; nevertheless, Jonathan’s crystal ball is different than mine. Mine says Iran may spurt out some violent, cowardly acts, but not near the extent his does. Because if they pull stuff to that extreme, they know we will make life in Iran much more miserable than it already is. One thing is for sure, the USA won’t be backing out as a coward, not with real maturity, that is actual presidential maturity as shown by the likes of Kennedy, Reagan, both Bushes and now Donald Trump! Certainly not one Barack Obama.
Boston Hit It Out Of The Park:
John that is, his column in the Signal on January 10th entitled “Hopefully, Mrs. Smith Does NOT Go to Washington” was such a home run I have to share a smidgen of it here in case you didn’t see it (entire piece can be read on The Signal’s website in the opinion section).
“Here’s why sane people can’t vote for you. You, Christy Smith, cannot be separated from your fellow California Democrats. The lunatic fringe of your party is running the show and you cannot separate yourself from that insanity. You vote with the crazies.”
“Your party’s voting record is like a balloon with the air let out, flying around a room. Abortion AFTER nine months? Really? World’s ending in nine years? Really? Giving votes to felons? To junior high schoolers? Why?
“Your party also is behind early release of criminals and enacting laws where people can’t be arrested for crimes involving a take of under a thousand bucks. Your party passed Senate Bill 1322, essentially legalizing child prostitution in this state. That’s where you can’t arrest anyone under 18 for selling their bodies for sex.”
“Your party was behind the passage of SB1383 — outlawing cow flatulence. That bill, as written, seems to call for inserting miles of intestinal pipelines in every bovine in the Golden State and venting their farts into a bag. Really Christy?”
“You collect billions and billions in taxes for roads and infrastructure. They’ve been in horrific shape for years. It’s so bad, major freeway interchange signs are unreadable at night and have been for years. Nothing. Gets. Fixed.”
“And your party screams at us with pretend crises while real ones are ignored. We suffer droughts, but can’t build reservoirs. We pay nosebleed prices for gas, but can’t build a new refinery in California.”
Boston articulates much more of these asinine left wing policies in his column, really hammering home the point of how nonsensical Dem thinking can be. To be fair I don’t know how many of these laws and policies Christy Smith was or is in favor of, but we sure know the majority of her Dem brethren are and that’s where the rub comes in.
Do we really want people in office who vigorously favor these types of policies to represent us in the swamp? I say NO WE DON’T and that’s why I’m pushing for MIKE GARCIA to help deliver us from this insanity!
The Identity Of It All:
Some headlines read; “No people of color on this week’s debate stage” “Why Democrats must pick a person of color for VP” “A woman must be part of a presidential ticket” “Would America elect a gay man for president?” “NFL is once again scrutinized for lack of opportunities for black coaches” Whatever happened to the “best and most qualified person should get the job”?
I’m not saying in the past there hasn’t been some promoting, hiring or electing done on a gender or race basis. I’m saying it’s a good thing we’ve come a long way from those days, but now it’s drifted way too far the other way (should I say to the left?) due to a desire based on idealism.
Perhaps the reason no people of color are left in the presidential race is because they didn’t get the job done and they were unable to convince voters they were best for the job. That’s the way it should be in any job type situation. Let the best man, woman, LGBTQ+ person, etc. win based on what’s most important – their qualifications!
I like how a remark I came across brings this home: “People who think with their epidermis or their genitalia or their clan are the problem to begin with. One does not banish this specter by invoking it. If I would not vote against someone on the grounds of ‘race’ or ‘gender’ alone, then by the exact same token I would not cast a vote in his or her favor for the identical reason.”
Quotes, Quips & Headlines:
“Dear Iran, the USA has disrespected your country, your flag, your people. 52% of us humbly apologize. We want peace with your nation, we are being held hostage by a terrorist regime. We do not know how to escape. Please do not kill us.” (Rose Mcgowan, actress)
*Should this woman’s sanity be in question? (Me)
Michael Moore apologizes to Iran on behalf of the American people for airstrike that killed Soleimani (Headline)
“If what is being projected is true, this is yet another example of collateral damage from the actions that have been taken in a provocative way by the president of the United States.” (Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif)
“Innocent civilians are now dead because they were caught in the middle of an unnecessary and unwanted military tit for tat.” (Pete Buttigieg)
*Where is Joe McCarthy when you need him? (Me)
“One of the questions I raised just right after this came out (Soleimani killing), does this have anything to do with the fact that Donald Trump is right on the eve of an impeachment hearing?” (Elizabeth Warren)
“Okay Elizabeth Warren, I’ve got an answer for you, the reason why now is that Soleimani just orchestrated an attack on our embassy, killed an American citizen, and we had very good intel from the CIA, from the DNI, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. They said it was the best intel they’ve ever seen, that there was an imminent attack coming within days. So, Elizabeth Warren, that is why.” (Rep. Dan Crenshaw)
*Do you think that makes any sense to Mrs. Warren, or does her hatred for Trump supersede logical thinking? (Me)
Queen Elizabeth issues statement after royal family summit to discuss future plans of Harry, Meghan (Headline)
*I don’t know what the statement was and I don’t care. With all of the stuff going on in the world who can give two rips about this? (Me)
Letter to the Ranter:
Good rant last week, I didn’t think it was possible but now all these morons look even stupider now that Iran shot down a plane with 170 innocent people, lied about it and only fessed up because the world figures it out in a hurry. And good to see Revolt over there, let’s pray this is The End of The Mullahs. Paul