Gary Horton, that is; the lovable columnist in The Signal Newspaper. Not that he went anywhere. It’s just that his writings lately have been about stuff that hasn’t made my breakfast rise to the surface. His column on June 5 grabbed my attention, though, as he reverted to his shout-outs of love (not) for our president.
It seems Gary thinks in order to be an effective president one has to possess the qualities of a Boy Scout (he didn’t mention if it was a Boy Scout or a girl who is a Boy Scout, but I guess that’s beside the point). As usual, he didn’t mention one iota about the kind of job Trump is doing as president, just the normal personal attacks on the man which Gary and his liberal brethren frequently resort to.
Could the reason they don’t talk about the actual job he’s doing be because they recognize the guy is actually performing well as president, and they don’t know how to refute that? The reason the Dems in Congress are laser-focused on impeachment and not on issues indicates the same dilemma for them.
Gary lists the qualities of a scout (I’m not saying boy because these days I could be accused of having some sort of girl phobia) as trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, reverent and clean. He claimed Trump meets only one of these qualifications, and that he is a clean-freak (not sure why, but he pondered if being a clean-freak would get Trump into heaven).
What Gary didn’t list are the qualities of a good leader, such as commitment and passion, decision making capabilities, making hard choices for the greater good which aren’t popular, following through on commitments, inspiring others and creative innovation. Notice no mention of personality traits here – that’s because I believe there are different styles of effective leadership, and just because a leader you don’t like is not a freaking scout, that doesn’t mean he isn’t doing one heck of a job!
Cats More Precious than Babies?
Ranter’s Note: I really do hate getting into the abortion issue; it’s such a sensitive subject that brings out strong emotions on both sides. But, I do have my own opinion on the matter, and to hide it would not be who I am, so here it goes. (As always, I urge anyone who feels differently than I do to write something about this, and I will be glad to publish it.)
The Headline read: “New York Passes Bill Outlawing Cat Declawing, Prompting Pro-life Outcry on State’s Liberal Abortion Practices.” When I read this, I thought back to the New York Legislature when they passed the bill legalizing late-term abortion and the legislative people were dancing in the aisles! I found it sickening they celebrated that bill and that those elected officials seem to care more about cats than babies!
After the cat bill passed, the tweets starting bouncing off the screens: “New York in January: Let’s legalize abortions up to birth and infanticide! New York Now: Declawing cats is horrible and evil!”
“In New York you may not be able to declaw your cat, but abortion of a baby up until the day of birth is fine.”
I cannot believe the majority of the folks who voted for these officials in New York can possibly agree with the crap these people are putting into law (on the second thought, maybe I can believe it for the district that voted A.O.C in).
Look, if they feel strongly a cat shouldn’t be declawed, so be it; if they want to outlaw dogs being debarked, okay; but what in their minds motivates them to allow the killing of a full-formed baby right up to birth, and even after birth?
Even when I disagree with someone on political stuff, I try really hard not to judge them on a personal basis, but when it comes to someone thinking animals are more important than a human life, I find myself judging BIG TIME!
Could It Ever Happen?
When I think about how states like New York pass liberal abortion bills compared to other states that have recently passed very restrictive abortion bills, I can’t help but wonder how this type of a political clash will ever be resolved. If we look at the Grand Canyon-wide differences that exist between conservatives and liberals on certain issues, with the canyon seemingly widening every year, is the only way to figure out what culture we’re going to live under going to be determined by some sort of revolution or civil war?
I know it seems far-fetched, but based on the trend of divisiveness that has been expanding over the last several years, how can we who support the values this great nation was built upon continue to be trampled on more and more by those who have a warped view of how a society should operate?
I shudder to think what the culture will be like in the United States for my 6, 4, 2-year-old and soon-to-be-born grandkids 30-40 years from now. Do we just let progressive liberals determine the cultural state of our nation, or do we present-day conservatives do something similar to what the men did in the revolution and civil war days?
All we have to do is to take a look at what’s happening in Hong Kong this week. Those folks are so passionate about protesting laws they disagree with, they have taken it upon themselves to fight the issues by rioting in the streets. The point being they don’t want to see their country end up in a certain way. Do conservatives need to consider this type of reaction in the future?
As one pundit put it: “There is a point I have been trying to make for most of the year that I think has been consistently missed by many in the conservative movement. That point being that the greatest danger to conservatives is NOT over zealous Leftists, but how we RESPOND to those Leftists. That is to say, I believe the globalists are using the Left as a cattle prod to dumb down conservatives and lure us into abandoning our principles.”
I don’t want to see us resort to violence, but what if the ills of liberalism can’t be fixed in a political fashion? Is that justification for an alternate strategy in order to protect the interest of generations to come, or do we just allow our principles to be abandoned for the sake of tranquility that will cause our grandchildren to live in a country that is screwed up beyond recognition?
Quotes, Quips and Headlines:
“Trying to reason with a Liberal is like playing chess with a pigeon. They knock over all the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like they won.” (Captain Billy)
*Nothing I can add to this one! (Me)
“I’ve worked so hard in my career, that I promise you, if I’m elected president you’re going to see the single most important thing that changes America. We’re going to cure cancer.”(Joe Biden)
*Is he serious right now?! How in the world can Biden make that claim? Talk about a desperate reach to garner votes. God help us if this guy gets elected.
“Democrat presidential hopefuls covet A.O.C endorsement (Headline)
*What a sad state of affairs for the Dems, when their candidates desperately want the Queen of the House’s (who is common-senseless when it comes to real life) stamp of approval. (Me)
“In L.A. alone, over 56,000 homeless Americans are living on the streets. That includes 11,000+ veterans. So why did California just pass a bill allotting $100,000,000 for free healthcare for illegal aliens? Why isn’t Kamala Harris putting Americans first in her state?” (Charlie Kirk)
*Right now I think Kamala only cares about getting votes from Americans in all states! (Me)
“The only reason pundits are urging Mexico to defy Donald Trump is because they hate him more than they hate a totally dysfunctional border. Mexico is complicit in destroying any semblance of order. It is a co-conspirator in creating untenable, unsustainable chaos. (Geraldo Rivera)
*This from a guy who has leaned too far left in the past for me. (Me)
Emails Place Dossier Author Steele a Step Closer to Clintons (Headline)
*Does a step closer to Clinton mean a step closer to Obama? (Me)
Call immigrant detention centers what they really are: concentration camps (Headline- LA Times)
*All I have to say about this one is it’s complete @#*$ %^S&! (Me)
Ex-Clinton Aide: If Trump probed Nadler, Schiff the way they conduct investigations on him, he’d be impeached (Headline)
*What’s it going to take for these guys to give up and do what they were voted in office to do! (Me)
“Investigations of the president, of the campaign, of the administration, of the president’s family, done with methods that were really meant to investigate people, not crimes, and things that seem to me to be way over the bounds of the Constitution.” (Mark Penn, political commentator)
*The problem is who can to hold these guys accountable for being over the bounds of the Constitution? (Me)